Registrer deg | Logg på | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Improved p<I>K</I><SUB><FONT SIZE='-1'>a</FONT></SUB> prediction: Combining empirical and semimicroscopic methods

by: Gernot Kieseritzky, EW Knapp
Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 9999, No. 9999. (2008), NA.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Using three different methods we tried to compute 171 experimentally known pKa values of ionizable residues from 15 different proteins and compared the accuracies of computed pKa values in terms of the root mean square deviation (RMSD) from experiment. One method is based on a continuum electrostatic model of the protein including conformational flexibility (KBPLUS). The others are empirical approaches with PROPKA deploying physically motivated energy terms with adjustable parameters and PKAcal using an empirical function with no physical basis. PROPKA reproduced the pKa values with highest overall accuracy. Differentiating the data set into weakly and strongly shifted experimental pKa values, however, we found that PROPKA's accuracy is better if the pKa values are weakly shifted but on equal footing with that of KBPLUS for more strongly shifted values. On the other hand, PKAcal reproduces strongly shifted pKa values badly but weakly shifted values with the same accuracy as PROPKA. We tested different consensus approaches combining data from all three methods to find a general procedure for most accurate pKa predictions. In most of the cases we found that the consensus approach reproduced experimental data with better accuracy than any of the individual methods alone. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2008


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.