| Registrer deg | Logg på | FAQ | [?] |
Improved p<I>K</I><SUB><FONT SIZE='-1'>a</FONT></SUB> prediction: Combining empirical and semimicroscopic methodsby: Gernot Kieseritzky, EW Knapp
Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 9999, No. 9999. (2008), NA.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractUsing three different methods we tried to compute 171 experimentally known pKa values of ionizable residues from 15 different proteins and compared the accuracies of computed pKa values in terms of the root mean square deviation (RMSD) from experiment. One method is based on a continuum electrostatic model of the protein including conformational flexibility (KBPLUS). The others are empirical approaches with PROPKA deploying physically motivated energy terms with adjustable parameters and PKAcal using an empirical function with no physical basis. PROPKA reproduced the pKa values with highest overall accuracy. Differentiating the data set into weakly and strongly shifted experimental pKa values, however, we found that PROPKA's accuracy is better if the pKa values are weakly shifted but on equal footing with that of KBPLUS for more strongly shifted values. On the other hand, PKAcal reproduces strongly shifted pKa values badly but weakly shifted values with the same accuracy as PROPKA. We tested different consensus approaches combining data from all three methods to find a general procedure for most accurate pKa predictions. In most of the cases we found that the consensus approach reproduced experimental data with better accuracy than any of the individual methods alone. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2008
BibTeX record
RIS record