| Registrer deg | Logg på | FAQ | [?] |
REPLY TO PUTNAM AND WALSHby: Partha Dasgupta
Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 03. (2007), pp. 365-372.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractSocial thinkers frequently remind us that people differ on what constitutes personal well-being, but that even when they don't differ, they disagree over the extent to which one person's well-being can be permitted to be traded off against another's. They tell us that political differences are to be traced to differences in people's conceptions of personal and social well-being. We are given to understand, in other words, that people's <em>ethics</em> differ.
BibTeX record
RIS record