| Registrer deg | Logg på | FAQ | [?] |
Serial Measurements of Cystatin C are More Accurate than Creatinine-based Methods in Detecting Declining Renal Function in Type 1 Diabetes.by: Erosha Premaratne, Richard Macisaac, Sue Finch, Sianna Panagiotopoulos, Elif Ekinci, George Jerums
Diabetes care (4 March 2008)
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractObjective Cystatin C and creatinine-based methods were compared with (99m)Tc-DTPA plasma clearance (isotopic Glomerular Filtration Rate or iGFR) for detecting declining renal function. Research Design and Methods: GFR was monitored over a mean of 10.1 years in 85 subjects with type 1 diabetes (average of 5.6 measurements per individual). Baseline mean iGFR of the cohort was 106.1+2.6ml/min/1.73m(2). The rates of decline in GFR (DeltaGFR) were derived using linear regression. Results In the 19/85 subjects with declining renal function (i.e. DeltaiGFR>3.3ml/min/1.73m(2) per year), DeltaGFR (ml/min/1.73m(2) per year) was: 6.5 by iGFR and 4.2 by 10(4)/creatinine, 3.6 by Cockcroft-Gault formula, 3.4 by MDRD-6 -equation and 3.5 by MDRD-4 variable-equation (p<0.01 versus iGFR). In comparison, DeltaGFR was 6.1 using the formula Cys-GFR=(86.7/cystatin C concentration)-4.2 (ns). Conclusions Cystatin C was more accurate in detecting decline in renal function than creatinine-based methods in this population of subjects with Type 1 and a normal mean baseline GFR.
BibTeX record
RIS record